Infrastructure Now

Rachel Maddow and Rep. Peter DeFazio (D-Oregon) are exactly right.



The U.S. government really needs to put its foot down on the public capital investment gas pedal right now. And specifically that means repairing existing infrastructure, not building new roads and bridges which only promote more oil consumption. Rail is the area that needs the biggest investment, including especially real high-speed rail. Let's start with a transcontinental line from New York to Los Angeles via Chicago, Denver, and Las Vegas, also building out the Los Angeles to San Francisco line that California voters approved. And let's sketch out an initial national network map for high-speed rail, to start thinking about the second phase.

Municipal water and sewer systems need urgent investment, to eliminate leaks and improve sanitation. Superfund sites should get cleaned up more quickly and completely. Airports, particularly small airports, need help to repair decaying runways and upgrade safety systems. And there should also be an integrated national plan to preserve existing airports and build a few new ones in areas of clear geographic need. For example, Chicago needs a new urban reliever airport closer to downtown. Cities need sensibly targeted urban renewal funds, to expand green space and support high density, mass transit-friendly redevelopment. Pollution control is desperately needed, especially for coal-fired plants and industries. Utility grids need more investment, especially if they will need to support new electric vehicles. Public utilities need funds to build new nuclear plants and other non-greenhouse gas energy plants. (Yes, I said nuclear.) Wetlands preservation and restoration is vital to restoring ecosystems and protecting against flooding. And, with all of this (and more), why not throw a few dollars toward artists who can help make this infrastructure more beautiful?

The U.S. need jobs, both in the short term and in the long term. There's no better policy prescription than for the federal government to spend aggressively in these and similar areas. Let's hope sanity prevails in Washington. Otherwise, the recession will be deeper and longer than necessary.

UPDATE #1: Just to give you some idea of what should be possible with real high-speed rail, a pure, dedicated ~300 Km/h dual track line (with some intermediate station sidings, such as Cleveland, Des Moines, Omaha, etc.) should be able to provide New York to Chicago nonstop express service in 4 hours, Chicago to Denver in 5, Denver to Las Vegas in 3.5, and Las Vegas to Los Angeles in well under 90 minutes. (Those would be your express stops on the fastest through trains, adding Omaha when phase 2 gets built.) For those of you who say that coast-to-coast doesn't make sense, keep in mind that coast-to-coast is the most efficient because it provides the most possible city pairs addressing the needs of the maximum number of travelers. It's much like how Southwest Airlines runs its planes. Also, in many places the high-speed rail station should be co-located with major airports or at least co-located with direct mass transit connections to those airports.

UPDATE #2: A "phase 2" high speed rail line might trace the other diagonal across the country, from Miami to Seattle, probably via cities such as Orlando, Atlanta, Nashville, St. Louis, Omaha (for interchange with the first line), and Portland. (There aren't a whole lot of cities on the great circle between Omaha and Portland, though.) After that there would be obvious built-out options, such as from San Francisco to Portland and an extension from Seattle to Vancouver. But that core "X" pattern probably yields the highest value and the most national of networks as quickly as possible. It makes possible and reasonable trips like Seattle to Cleveland, Miami to Denver, Las Vegas to Atlanta, etc.