Heads I Win, Tails I Win

Previously I wondered aloud why, for example, Ken Lewis, CEO of Bank of America, still has a job, amidst soaring unemployment. He ran his company into de facto bankruptcy, drove the stock price into a ditch, required massive infusions of taxpayer support, and overpaid for Merrill Lynch. If he were a plumber the house would be flooded, sewage would come out of the shower head, and there'd be no hot water. Yet he still has a job, and thousands of competent plumbers are collecting unemployment insurance.

Lewis is not just an isolated example. Why do most of AIG's corporate risk officers still have jobs? If they worked for an automobile manufacturer, they would have failed to notice that a metal knife blade affixed to the steering wheel and pointing at the driver might pose a safety hazard.

Then there's the case of Jake DeSantis, one of the 377 vastly overpaid geniuses at AIG's Financial Products group, the one that destroyed the company. He wrote a New York Times Op-Ed explaining why he still deserved a bonus. Matt Taibbi tears him a new orifice.

These cases are not isolated. They are common, even typical. Executive compensation has been totally decoupled from shareholder interests. And it's the taxpayers who own many of these companies now, or should if public officials were acting in taxpayer interests instead of grabbing money from public coffers and sending it to Wall Street, even without equity stakes.

We don't have a market economy. We have a kleptocracy, more akin to Putin's Russia or Marcos's Philippines. (I am in general agreement with Simon Johnson.) Obama is trying to get FDIC-like authority to take financial institutions into receivership if they are insolvent, and there's also a proposal that shareholders vote directly on executive compensation rather than leave such important matters to a board of directors. (Speaking of which, why, in corporate America, is a shareholder, who does not return his proxy, surrendering his vote to the current Chairman and Board, to vote as they please? If shareholders support current management, then they should have to vote as such. If they don't vote, they shouldn't count for any side.) Obama's budget proposal also helps make the tax code more progressive and close loopholes such as hedge fund compensation taxes. All these policies will help, but they won't be enough, and of course the kleptocracy is fighting them. After all, when you don't have the talent to make money the old fashioned way (by earning it), why not steal it?